Amazon Wins Preliminary Injunction Against Perplexity’s Comet

A federal choose has granted Amazon a preliminary injunction barring Perplexity AI from utilizing its Comet browser brokers to entry password-protected Amazon accounts and programs.

U.S. District Decide Maxine M. Chesney issued the order in San Francisco federal courtroom, discovering that Amazon is prone to succeed on the deserves of its claims. The preliminary injunction additionally bars Perplexity from creating or utilizing accounts for the aim of AI agent entry and orders the corporate to destroy Amazon information it collected by way of Comet.

Amazon sued Perplexity in November, alleging the startup dedicated pc fraud by disguising Comet as a regular Chrome browser and refusing to determine it as an AI agent whereas making purchases.

What The Courtroom Ordered

The preliminary injunction bars Perplexity from utilizing Comet or every other AI agent to entry password-protected components of Amazon’s programs.

Within the order, Decide Chesney wrote that Amazon introduced “robust proof” that Perplexity, by way of its Comet browser, accessed Amazon consumer accounts “with the Amazon consumer’s permission however with out authorization by Amazon.”

The courtroom handled consumer consent and platform authorization as two separate necessities at this stage of the case. A consumer giving Comet their Amazon login credentials didn’t routinely give Comet the suitable to make use of them on Amazon’s platform.

Chesney discovered Amazon happy all 4 authorized necessities for a preliminary injunction, together with that Amazon would undergo irreparable hurt with out one. The choose wrote that “Perplexity has made clear that, within the absence of the reduction requested, it’ll proceed to have interaction within the above-referenced challenged conduct.”

The courtroom denied Perplexity’s request for a keep pending enchantment however granted a 7-day administrative keep from March 9 so the corporate can search a keep from the Ninth Circuit. The courtroom additionally denied a bond requirement.

Amazon’s Response

Amazon spokesperson Lara Hendrickson informed Bloomberg the preliminary injunction “will stop Perplexity’s unauthorized entry to the Amazon retailer and is a crucial step in sustaining a trusted purchasing expertise for Amazon prospects.”

Amazon has maintained all through the case that third-party brokers should determine themselves and function with the platform’s consent. In a statement alongside the lawsuit, the corporate objected to Comet providing a “considerably degraded purchasing and customer support expertise.” CEO Andy Jassy said on an earnings call that Amazon anticipated to accomplice with third-party brokers over time, however by itself phrases.

Background

Amazon despatched Perplexity a cease-and-desist letter in October, demanding the corporate cease disguising Comet as a Chrome browser and transparently determine its AI brokers when working on Amazon.

Perplexity responded with a weblog submit titled “Bullying is not innovation,” arguing that Comet acts on behalf of customers who’ve granted it entry to their very own accounts. The corporate’s place was {that a} consumer agent inherits the consumer’s permissions. The courtroom’s ruling rejects that argument, not less than at this preliminary stage.

Amazon filed its lawsuit in November beneath the federal Laptop Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and California’s Complete Laptop Knowledge Entry and Fraud Act. The grievance alleged Perplexity accessed protected computer systems with out authorization, put buyer information in danger, and degraded the purchasing expertise.

Perplexity’s authorized response argued that Comet solely automates actions the shopper directs, like including gadgets to a cart or finishing a checkout. The corporate in contrast Amazon’s claims to a platform attempting to cease customers from hiring assistants to behave on their behalf.

Why This Issues

The ruling provides an early take a look at how a federal courtroom might deal with AI brokers that entry a consumer’s authenticated account on a third-party platform with out that platform’s consent.

The query on the heart of this case goes past Amazon and Perplexity. OpenAI’s ChatGPT launched checkout options earlier this yr. Google, Microsoft, and Shopify are all constructing or enabling agentic commerce instruments. Each a kind of merchandise will ultimately have to work together with platforms that will not need them there.

The courtroom’s therapy of consumer permission and platform authorization as separate authorized necessities at this preliminary stage provides corporations new language to quote in future disputes. If the reasoning holds by way of trial, AI brokers that entry logged-in accounts may wish permission from each the consumer and the platform proprietor, not the consumer alone.

Safety can be a part of the image. Brave published details final August a couple of immediate injection vulnerability in Comet that allowed attackers to entry information in different open browser tabs. Amazon cited Comet’s safety weaknesses in its grievance as proof of hurt to prospects.

A recent SEJ analysis famous that when AI browsers like Comet go to web sites on a consumer’s behalf, the visitors is usually indistinguishable from a daily Chromium browser go to. That creates measurement issues for entrepreneurs and raises questions on whether or not platforms may even detect when an agent is performing on their web site.

Wanting Forward

The preliminary injunction stands whereas the complete case proceeds. Perplexity has till March 16 to hunt a keep from the Ninth Circuit earlier than the order takes impact.

The broader lawsuit will check whether or not the CFAA applies to AI brokers performing at a consumer’s course on third-party platforms. How the courtroom finally guidelines may form how each agentic commerce product interacts with web sites that haven’t opted into agent entry.

Perplexity has not publicly commented on the injunction.

Featured Picture: Koshiro Ok/Shutterstock