In case you rank your individual product #1 in “best of” listicles, it’s not only a search-quality difficulty — it could violate FTC guidelines that took impact in October 2024.
Driving the information. As Lily Ray noted on LinkedIn, the FTC’s Client Evaluate Rule (16 CFR Part 465) prohibits a number of misleading practices tied to opinions and testimonials, together with:
- Presenting company-controlled content material as impartial opinions.
- Publishing opinions of services or products by no means truly used.
- Attributing opinions to individuals who didn’t write them.
Penalties can attain as much as $53,088 per violation, and every web page could depend individually. Ray additionally shared a reference desk she generated with the assistance of Claude:


Why now. “Finest X” and “High 10 Y” listicles have surged as a GEO tactic over the previous couple of years. These pages typically carry out properly in search and more and more affect AI-generated solutions.
The backstory. Earlier than the rule was formalized, Ray stated not less than one firm confronted authorized motion for publishing lots of of “better of” pages that:
- Ranked its personal providers #1.
- Included fabricated competitor opinions.
- Used pretend opinions on third-party platforms.
The Higher Enterprise Bureau later censured the corporate for unsubstantiated claims.
What’s taking place. Many trendy listicles comply with an identical sample:
- A model publishes a “finest instruments” listing.
- Contains opponents it hasn’t examined.
- Makes use of subjective or invented scoring techniques.
- Ranks itself #1.
These listicles could indicate independence or firsthand analysis when neither exists.
The nuance. You’ll be able to publish comparability content material that features your individual product. Nonetheless, primarily based on FTC steering, danger will increase when:
- You indicate objectivity, however promote your individual product.
- You current opinions not primarily based on actual expertise.
- You fail to obviously disclose materials relationships.
What Google is saying. Google is conscious of the low-quality listicle pattern. In an announcement to The Verge, a Google spokesperson stated the corporate applies protections in opposition to manipulation in Search and Gemini, and reiterated its steering: create content material for folks and guarantee it’s comprehensible to look techniques.
Why we care. What has labored as a visibility tactic could carry danger on two fronts — regulators and a possible Google Search algorithm change. Which means this fashionable GEO tactic may decline shortly as its effectiveness drops.
Caveat. I’m not a lawyer. Seek the advice of your individual authorized counsel in the event you’re involved about utilizing this tactic.
Search Engine Land is owned by Semrush. We stay dedicated to offering high-quality protection of promoting matters. Until in any other case famous, this web page’s content material was written by both an worker or a paid contractor of Semrush Inc.
#lowquality #listicles #lose #edge #Google #Search

